China 1200 words / 4 pages case study due within 14 hrs from now

[ad_1]

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

BUS-390 BUS-390-O500 Impact of Emerging Technology on the Economy of the Country 100.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Criteria 100.0%

Problem Definition in Selected Country. Individuals Affected, Location of Individuals, and Socioeconomic Costs to the Affected Individuals 10.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to provide an explanation of a current problem in the selected country. It does not identify who is affected, where the individuals are located, and what are the resulting socioeconomic costs to the affected individuals. No scholarly sources are used to support our claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper provides a vague explanation of a current problem in the selected country. It provides a vague explanation of who is affected, where the individuals are located, and what are the resulting socioeconomic costs to the affected individuals. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper provides a basic explanation of a current problem in the selected country. It provides a basic explanation of who is affected, where the individuals are located, and what are the resulting socioeconomic costs to the affected individuals. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. The paper provides an adequate explanation of a current problem in the selected country. It provides an adequate explanation of who is affected, where the individuals are located, and what are the resulting socioeconomic costs to the affected individuals. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides an expert explanation of a current problem in the selected country. It provides an expert explanation of who is affected, where the individuals are located, and what are the resulting socioeconomic costs to the affected individuals. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Emerging Global and/or Local Technologies, and Associated Costs, that Could be Used to Solve the Problem 15.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to provide a description of global and/or local emerging technologies that could be used to solve the problem, and the costs associated with implementing the technology. No scholarly sources are used to support your claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper provides a vague description of global and/or local emerging technologies that could be used to solve the problem, and the costs associated with implementing the technology. No scholarly sources are used to support your claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper provides a basic description of global and/or local emerging technologies that could be used to solve the problem, and the costs associated with implementing the technology. Scholarly sources are used to support your claims. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. The paper provides an adequate description of global and/or local emerging technologies that could be used to solve the problem, and the costs associated with implementing the technology. Scholarly sources are used to support your claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides an expert description of global and/or local emerging technologies that could be used to solve the problem, and the costs associated with implementing the technology. Scholarly sources are used to support your claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Location of the Technology in the Hype Cycle within the Country 10.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to identify the correct location of the technology in the hype cycle within the country with supporting justification. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper inadequately identifies the correct location of the technology in the hype cycle within the country with insufficient supporting justification. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper basically identifies the location of the technology in the hype cycle within the country with some supporting justification. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. The paper adequately identifies the correct location of the technology in the hype cycle within the country with detailed supporting justification. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper expertly identifies the correct location of the technology in the hype cycle within the country with detailed supporting justification. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Application of the Hype Cycle and 6 D’s Model to the Emerging Technology 15.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to provide an application of the hype cycle and the 6 D’s model to the emerging technology. Detailed analysis and justification are not provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper provides a vague application of the hype cycle and the 6 D’s model to the emerging technology. Analysis and justification are not provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper provides a basic application of the hype cycle and the 6 D’s model to the emerging technology. Basic analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides an adequate application of the hype cycle and the 6 D’s model to the emerging technology. Adequate analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides an expert application of the hype cycle and the 6 D’s model to the emerging technology. Detailed analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

How the Emerging Technology will Foster Sustainability in the Country’s Economy 15.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to provide an explanation as to what extent this emerging technology will foster sustainability on the economy in the country. Analysis and justification are not provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper provides a vague explanation as to what extent this emerging technology will foster sustainability on the economy in the country. Inadequate analysis and justification are provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper provides a basic explanation as to what extent this emerging technology will foster sustainability on the economy in the country. Basic analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. The paper provides an adequate explanation as to what extent this emerging technology will foster sustainability on the economy in the country. Adequate analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides an expert explanation as to what extent this emerging technology will foster sustainability on the economy in the country. Detailed analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Two Recommendations How an Existing MNC in that Country Could Support Sustainability Initiatives by Implementation of the Emerging Technology 15.0% The paper does not meet the requirement to provide two recommendations for how an existing MNC in the selected country could support sustainability initiatives by implementation of the emerging technology to resolve the problem. Detailed supporting analysis and justification are not provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic. The paper provides two inadequate recommendations for how an existing MNC in that country could support sustainability initiatives by implementation of the emerging technology to resolve the problem. Inadequate supporting analysis and justification are provided. No scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. The paper provides two basic recommendations for how an existing MNC in that country could support sustainability initiatives by implementation of the emerging technology to resolve the problem. Basic supporting analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. The paper provides two adequate recommendations for how an existing MNC in that country could support sustainability initiatives by implementation of the emerging technology to resolve the problem. Adequate supporting analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. The paper provides two expert recommendations for how an existing MNC in that country could support sustainability initiatives by implementation of the emerging technology to resolve the problem. Detailed supporting analysis and justification are provided. Scholarly sources are used to support claims. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 4.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Paper is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 3.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources Solid academic writing is used, and in-text citations and references are presented using APA documentation guidelines. 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage 100%

[ad_2]

Homework helper

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.